interesting thought
Here is a hypothetical comparison that will explain the controversy over vaccines in a very simple manner. Peanut butter, for example, is enjoyable to eat and nutritious. It is healthy for you and causes no harm, as a majority to all people. It’s clearly good to eat it, right? Approximately 1.5 million Americans are allergic to peanut butter so roughly 1 out of every 300 persons has serious adverse reactions to peanut butter. Now imagine that there was no way to determine if you were that 1 in 300 that has a negative reaction to eating peanut butter? This is the case for many vaccines. Now imagine that this 1 in 300 number is, for whatever reason, inaccurate and you were not told that it may be higher, say substantially higher?
Some vaccines have higher adverse reaction rates than people think and some have those high rates even after passing clinical trials with lesser recorded rates, even though the studies show they are much higher. If someone were to object to peanut butter because of adverse reactions, that is the same as someone objecting to certain vaccines because of the adverse reaction rates. Now imagine if there were clinical studies hinting at the possibility that a very high number of reactions to eating a certain brand of peanut butter on the market, say 1 in every 10 or 20 people, result in a serious neurological disease, paralysis or even death? Imagine if a few peanut butter manufacturing companies were caught selling expired products, contaminated goods or even adding potentially carcinogenic additives in their product? Welcome to the world of vaccines. Objecting to a vaccine is not the same as saying all vaccines are harmful. It’s all about a game of fractions.
Because vaccines are a preventative measure, they should never be forced. An anti-viral is something that is a response to an outbreak. This is not the same as a vaccination. A vaccination is a strictly preventative measure to help reduce the risk of the patient getting sick. It quite simply just improves the immunity to a particular disease. But since it is not a responsive measure, in other words, since it is not an anti-biotic or anti-viral trying to fight an infection or disease that you actually have, then there is no reason to make people get a vaccine by force. The United States overwhelmingly supports this idea, although health officials and politicians in different states are radically changing this issue, many people consider to be a personal rights issue relating to one’s liberty, or right to choose.
As you will see in our videos here at VaccinationEducation.com, all vaccines have an adverse reaction rate, which varies from person to person, however, the majority of people do not experience these results because the vaccines have passed certain clinical trials to be approved. Many of the leading questions and concerns over vaccinations include the list of side effects described which are considered to be adverse reactions. Another concern heard most often is the absence of information over connections between certain vaccines on the market and other afflictions such as neurological disorders like autism. Other concerns include over-vaccination, contaminated inoculations, and misuse or abuse of vaccinations as the result of a conspiracy. Through this website, documentaries and video news reports are made available for viewing which explore all of these possibilities as well as confirm some of these fears. Most people are unaware of the amount of credible information available, for example through this website, which documents cases of abuse and mistrust with vaccines.
Most vaccines have a small reaction rate that initiate severe side effects such as death or paralysis, which is how they pass clinical trials, but it is important to understand that almost all vaccines have these rates, no matter how small they are. This website supports the claim that vaccines themselves are not bad as a majority, because of this reality that most people do not suffer harmful reactions after taking a shot.
Vaccines are more often than not a completely safe decision according to the statistics. However, those who think that objecting to vaccines is the same as being anti-vaccine in general do not realize that there are certain vaccines on the market which cause a higher rate of severe reactions or are connected to studies proving that they cause neurological damage. Some vaccines that the government and mainstream authorities of trust have in the past, as you will learn on this website, been iniquitous in its duty from time to time to tell the public about criminal behavior related to vaccines. The problem is, there is still not enough information for most vaccines to determine who falls into the risk potential for a severe reaction. In other words, it is still considered a gamble for most vaccines if you get that detrimental reaction or not, regardless of how small it is.
Many vaccine adverse reaction rates have been studied to determine what to look for in a person that will trigger a negative reaction to taking the vaccine, like blood type, heart condition and so on. Because every person is different and our bodies are so unique, it is irresponsible to force vaccinations on the public, aside from being a violation of their rights.
